Print to Page   |   Contact Us   |   Your Cart   |   Sign In   |   Register
Community Search
Complexity Matters
Blog Home All Blogs
The Complexity Matters blog features the Thursday Complexity Post as well as other complexity inspired news items.

 

Search all posts for:   

 

They Got Garbage, They Give Symphonies

Posted By Prucia Buscell, Thursday, May 16, 2013

Juan Manuel Chavez draws deep sweet sounds from a cello made from a battered empty oil can, a meat tenderizing tool and another gadget meant for making gnocchi. Aida Maribel Rios Bardados plays a violin ingeniously crafted from scraps of trash.

Juan Manuel and Aida Maribel play in the Landfill Harmonic Orchestra in Cateura, Paraguay, a deeply impoverished slum outside of Asuncion. About 20 youngsters, aged 11 to 19, play beautiful Mozart, Bach, Vivaldi, some contemporary Latin music and orchestral versions of Beatles songs on instruments made almost entirely with materials scavenged from the sprawling landfill where the people of Cateura live with the 1,500 tons of solid waste dumped every day. A Mother Jones article by Zaineb Mohammed tells the story. Watch an amazing Youtube video. See photos on Facebook.

The project was ignited when a local musician, Favio Chavez, brought a youth orchestra from a neighboring town to Cateura, hoping to distract kids from gangs and drugs. The young listeners were enthusiastic, but there was no money for instruments. "A community like Cateura is not a place to have a violin,” Chavez says in film clips about the orchestra. "In fact, a violin is worth more than a house here.”

Nicolas Gomez earns his living picking through garbage and he has a genius for building things. He and Chavez began experimenting with instruments that might be constructed through the exquisite recombination of bits and pieces discovered sifting through mountains of refuse. All kinds of discarded objects were transformed into wind and stringed instruments. Tin water pipes modified with buttons and bottle caps for keys and spoon and fork handles became saxophones. A water pipe with coins for keys became a flute. Percussion instruments were built for a hearing impaired child, who turned out to be a talented drummer. With Chavez directing, the young musicians flourished.

Alejandra Nash, an Asuncion native and film maker, learned about the orchestra four years ago and decided to produce a documentary. She and colleagues aim for a release in 2014.

Visit their Kickstarter page for more on the Landfill Harmonic. Nash launched the page in April asking $175,000 to fund the movie, and almost $200,000 has been raised. Extra funds will help finance a world tour for the young musicians. The orchestra has already performed in Brazil and Colombia, and has been invited to Europe, Japan, India and the US.

The musicians and their music have a message. Rodolfo Madero, the film’s executive producer, told Mother Jones he envisions a Landfill Harmonic Movement with projects that can be replicated elsewhere-he says health and environmental groups in Mexico, Kenya and Haiti are interested. Because the landfill lies along the Paraguay River, its pollution is threatening a national water source. "What these kids are showing us is that you shouldn’t throw away your things-or people...” Madero told the magazine. He says these young musicians are living proof that that not everything is disposable.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Ancient Mystery: Synchronized Emergence of Periodical Cicadas

Posted By Prucia Buscell, Thursday, May 02, 2013

Residents of the Northeastern United States can soon expect a wildlife phenomenon not seen elsewhere in the world. Brood II Cicadas, Magicicada septendicum, the cousins of crickets and katydids and one of the longest living insects in the world, will emerge from their 17-years of living underground. Millions will fill the skies, cover trees and plants, mate, lay eggs, and then die, leaving piles of dead cicada bodies on the ground. It’s a life cycle that has intrigued scientists for centuries.

They’re harmless-they don't bite, sting or damage property-so environmentalists caution against insecticides. But they can be annoying. Males buzz to attract females, each of whom will then lay hundreds of eggs to perpetuate their kind. Listen to cicada love song here. The National Geographic reports the noise at its peak reaches 110 decibels, about as loud as a chain saw, and may repel some predatory wolves, foxes, birds and reptiles that might otherwise eat them. Cicadamania.com describes their biology and habits, and even suggests bagpipes to scare live ones away from outdoor events.

Their real protection is their numbers. Craig Gibbs, writing in the New York Times, explains there are so many of them that even voracious consumption by predators won’t make much of a dent in their population. They’ve been seen in clusters of up to 1.5 million per acre.

This spring’s Brood II cicadas are the offspring of Magicicadas last seen in 1996. (Other broods have 13 year life cycles.) The genetic mechanism that prompts them to emerge is triggered when the ground warms to a consistent 64 degrees F. They live underground from Connecticut to North Carolina, and build above ground chimneys that keep soil and water from falling into the hole as they prepare to emerge.

How and why did these creatures evolve their synchronized life cycles? Gibbs says one theory is that their cycle was a response to atmospheric cooling during the Pleistocene, to guarantee sufficient populations for successful reproduction. Some researchers think their evolutionary history may hold clues to how future climate change could impact cicadas and other insects.

Another theory is that their long life and synchronous emergence makes predators unable to anticipate their presence. Daniel Stone writes National Geographic News that the cycles of 13 and 17 years, both prime numbers in mathematics, may aid their survival. He reports on Brazilian research suggesting that a cicada with a 17 year cycle and a parasite with a two year cycle, for instance, would meet only twice in a century.

Cicadas help aerate the soil, and living or dead, they are a source of protein for large and small creatures. They were reportedly a delicacy for Iroquois and Onondaga Indians, and adventurous eaters can find recipes online for cicadas chopped and fried.

Several citizen science projects, such as the New York Public Radio RadioLab Cicada Tracker, may contribute to an understanding of these mysterious ancient creatures.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

The Real and Surreal Merge in Cyberspace

Posted By Prucia Buscell, Thursday, April 25, 2013

For James Gleick, the massive interconnectivity that kept Americans informed and misinformed on the Boston bombings, shootings, manhunt and capture of a suspect represents a "watershed for Total Noise" in a strange and unstable information ecosystem where reality and fiction intermingle.

In a New York magazine essay, Gleick describes the condition that late novelist David Foster Wallace called Total Noise: "the tsunami of available fact, context and perspective." Gleick is the author of Chaos: Making a New Science, which came out in 1987 and first made the principles and early development of chaos theory understandable to the general public. He is a prolific writer, whose 1999 book Faster: The Acceleration of Just About Everything (review), tells how we had even then undergone an informational and social phase change through the massive interconnections of people by way of modern technology. In his New York piece, he writes that with Twitter feeds burgeoning, microblogging, Instagram, "Internet vigilantes bleeding into the FBI's staggeringly complex" forensic video analysis, and crowdsourcing by social media users, the dividing line between cyberspace and the real world has vanished.

In her New York Times column, Maureen Dowd recalls when Gleick was her editor, and reports on a recent interview in which she asked him to reflect on how we can make sense of relentless waves of unorganized contradictory and changeable data. Gleick told her he followed Twitter on his iPhone during the Boston crisis, and added, "The Internet is messy, pointillist, noisy, often wrong. But if you had a visceral need for instantaneity, TV couldn't compete."

Gleick writes about the gaffs of TV news reporters and anchors who traded accuracy for speed, the blizzard of banal verbiage from commentators who had to fill time with no new information, and misleading bits bandied about when everyone is monitoring everyone else and "no one can bear to be left out." Reddit users named innocent people as suspects. Gleick says the best understanding of events was produced in newspaper stories written by reporters on the scene.

Dowd asked him about an incident in which the Syrian Electronic Army hacked the AP Twitter account and falsely reported that President Obama had been injured in White House explosions, causing a three minute $136 billion stock plunge. He notes hacking happens; and bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is not the only one who has had real and fake Twitter accounts.

"There is no perfect trust in Cyberspace," Gleick told Dowd. "We have all these new channels and tools to understand the world as it happens, but there is no reliable algorithm for sorting through the morass. ...we have to invent a new personal methodology every day. And if we're waiting for things to settle down and become simple, that's never going to happen."

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Conversation, Engagement and Front-Line Ownership

Posted By Prucia Buscell, Thursday, April 18, 2013
Updated: Wednesday, April 17, 2013
Everyone can learn processes to generate and maintain organizational change. Organizational achievements can blossom when everyone is engaged. Safety culture in hospitals flourishes when front line staff members take ownership of safety issues.

Three articles by people affiliated with Plexus Institute examine how these ideas can benefit organizations and the people they serve.

Lisa Kimball's article, "Changing the Organization One Conversation at a Time," (pdf) describes processes that help facilitate productive large group meetings, intervene in whole systems, and maintain the enthusiasm that emerges from provocative discussions in newly formed relationships. Liberating Structures (LS), for instance, form a framework for designing processes that support high quality conversations. The structures are easy to learn and their use can promote creativity and engagement, not only at meetings but when people return to their daily routines. Lisa describes them as "Lego-like components that can be mixed and matched" for use anywhere people gather. The payoff, she said, comes when the use of these helpful processes becomes so widely distributed that it is the norm rather than the exception. Some useful LS processes include wicked questions, silence, and 15 percent solutions.

Questions are "wicked" when tension and paradox are embedded. There are no obvious solutions, and no right or wrong answers. Wicked questions expose assumptions and elicit new ideas. An example might be: How can we maintain top-down discipline needed for safety at the same time we level the playing field for bottom-up creativity? A brief silence creates a boundary between past activities and the present phase of a discussion, and it's a good reset technique if a discussion is veering off track. Peter Drucker suggested that most people control only about 15 percent of their work situations, and the other 85 percent is shaped by the existing structures, systems, events and culture in their environment. People who make the best use of their own 15 percent can create small changes that have outsized impact. Lisa's article appears in the Spring 2013 issue of the OD Practitioner, the Journal of the Organizational Development Network. Lisa has served as a Plexus Institute trustee and is its former president and CEO.

"More We than Me: Using Positive Deviance to Engage Everyone," (pdf) by Prucia Buscell, appears in the same issue. It describes how people from many departments and different disciplines at the Albert Einstein Healthcare Network in Philadelphia worked together using the Positive Deviance (PD) approach to drastically reducing the incidence of healthcare associated Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
(MRSA) infections. PD is based on the idea that in every community there are individuals or groups who solve problems better than colleagues who have access to the same resources. In healthcare, PD bridges the gap between what care-givers know and what they do. They know infection reduction protocols, but don't always follow them. At Einstein, all individuals in the healthcare environment-physicians, nurses, aides, therapists, housekeepers, and staff in all support services-engaged in the effort to prevent transmission of pathogens that might happen in their own work areas. People from different departments met and collaborated on ways to remove barriers to consistent adherence to known infection control practices. Asked if their achievements could be sustained, several healthcare workers emphatically said "yes." It would last, they insisted, because it was their own process. Prucia is communications director at Plexus Institute.

"Front-Line Ownership: Generating a Cure Mindset for Patient Safety" (pdf) will appear online April 26th in Healthcare Papers: A New Model for the New Healthcare, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2013. While great advances have been achieved in the field of infection prevention and control, the authors of this article believe even greater progress has been hindered by power gradients, dysfunctional relationships, and lack of "safety mindfulness" in hospital and healthcare environments. One successful approach to these problems, they suggest, is front-line ownership, or FLO. Ownership involves having people who do the work develop ideas for design and implementation of solutions. The authors discuss the logic involved in safety, the need for inter-connectivity to amplify safety efforts, and the importance of context and social proof in developing a safety culture. The underpinnings of the FLO approach, they write, are Positive Deviance, and a complexity science analysis of complex adaptive systems and resilience. Their work also used social network mapping, Liberating Structures and insights from the field of organizational development. Their 18-month study at five Canadian hospitals provided evidence that FLO reduced the combined pathogenic organism rate at study sites and allowed different groups to attain best practices in ways that worked most successfully in their individual settings.

The authors are Brenda Zimmerman, Paige Reason, Liz Rykert, Leah Gitterman, Jennifer Christian and Michael Gardam. Liz is a former Plexus Institute trustee.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Youth Obesity: Not Just Gluttony Or Sloth

Posted By Prucia Buscell, Thursday, April 11, 2013
Updated: Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Why are one third of American children and adolescents obese or overweight? Recent research suggests multiple surprising causes such as plate size, a dearth of home cooking, environmental chemicals, and school schedules that keep teens from getting enough sleep.

A Scientific American story by Tara Haelle describes three studies that point to environmental factors, rather than genes or inactivity, as spurs to excess weight.

"We're raising our children in a world that is vastly different" from the world of 40 or 50 years ago, Yoni Freedhoff, an obesity doctor at the University of Ottawa told the magazine. He says obesity is the consequence of normal kids being raised in abnormal and unhealthy environments.

Jennifer Orlet Fisher, an associate professor of public health at Temple's Center for Obesity Research and Education, studied 42 second graders who served themselves in a buffet lunch line. She found that kids who had an adult dinner sized plate-10.25 inches in diameter-served themselves 90 calories more than kids who used a 7.25 inch plate. Kids with the big plates didn't always eat every bite, but they still ate far more than classmates with smaller plates. Today's dietary environment offers easy access to lots of tasty foods in big portions, Fisher says, adding, "To promote self-regulation you have to constrain the environment to make the healthy choice the easy choice."

Harvard Medical School Pediatrics Professor David Bickham led a study on the link between obesity and screen time, studying 921 teens who reported their use of TV, video games and computers. Bickam and colleagues found games and computer use had no impact on body mass index (BMI). But TV did. Three common theories say media fosters obesity because kids are influenced by advertising, they eat unconsciously, and they are not physically active while they are sitting in front of a screen. When kids watch TV, researchers found, their hands are free, and food ads stimulate desire to eat and high calorie consumption. Viewing healthy fruits and vegetables on the TV screens may not help. "Our hunger hormones have been honed after millions of years of dietary insecurity, so when we want to eat, we tend not to crave green leafy salads," Bickhamsaid. He emphasizes the relationship between TV and weight is calorie intake, not inactivity.

Another study that deemphasizes the role of inactivity in excess weight involved teenagers and sleep. Jonathan Mitchell, a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Pennsylvania, and colleagues tracked sleep habits of 1,400 teens and found that less sleep translates into higher a BMI. Lack of sleep had a stronger influence on the weight of kids who were already obese. Tired, sleep-deprived kids maybe less active, he noted, but the observed link was not fully explained by inactivity. Earlier research has suggested sleep deprivation may disrupt the body's regulatory hormones, which control hunger and satiety. Freedhoff says "dozens and dozens" of environmental factors, including more fast food, sugary drinks, the ubiquity of vending machines and the tendency of adults to use food as pacification and reward all tend to make kids fatter.

The National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences has reported that certain chemical exposures may be linked to obesity and diabetes. A study by Dr. Duk-Hee Lee showed that the risk of diabetes was not increased in overweight people with low exposures to persistent organic pollutants (POPs), which suggested to her that exposure to POPs could be an even better explanation for diabetes than obesity. Several researchers have explored associations between hormone altering environmental chemicals and childhood obesity.

As Freedhoff told the Scientific American, this problem requires collaboration. It will take efforts by whole communities including parents, schools, sports teams, and businesses to "redraft" the environment of children and families.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Personal Stories Diffuse Political Polarization

Posted By Prucia Buscell, Thursday, April 04, 2013

The Mantle Project is Nabil Laoudji’s effort to combine compelling stories with the kind of deep dialogue that creates human connection. The project is named for the layer beneath the earth’s crust and the goal is conversation that penetrates beneath the surface of conventional rhetoric. It is influenced by the observation of psychotherapist Carl Rogers who believed "what is most personal is most universal.”

Members of Mothers for Justice and Equality, a group that campaigns against violence, and people from the West Springfield Firearm and Knife Show have very different attitudes about guns. The Mantle Project, together with the Public Conversations Project and the Christian Science Monitor, will bring them together April 11 to delve into the stories and experiences that have shaped individual views.

A Christian Science Monitor story by Allison Terry tells how Laoudji’s last Mantle Project got members of the Tea Party and Occupy Boston to exchange their stories together on the same stage in front of an audience.

Christine Morabito, president of the Greater Boston Tea Party, gladly accepted the invitation to tell her story, but soon realized the stump speech she prepared wasn’t what Laoudji was seeking. He pressed her to look deeply into what had shaped her beliefs. She mentioned that she had attempted suicide in her early 20s. Laoudji pressed her to probe that. In the aftermath she felt completely dependent on other people, and she said she hated it. She began to work on personal responsibility. With that focus, the Tea Party mantra appealed to her. Another speaker, Tammy Weitzman, told of racing home in terror as a child in Tel Aviv after two men shot up a bus and her school was closed. She realized she had been taught to fear people who were not like herself.

When a political conversation began among people in the audience, Laoudji told the Monitor, "We started from a very different place because we had already been open and listening and understanding each other.”

He also describes a discussion between business students and Occupy participants, who recognized they probably harbored stereotypical views of each other. One protester speculated that America’s reluctance to confront mortality makes us cling to habits and systems, and could have been a factor in bailing out troubled banks, rather than allowing them to fail so something new could emerge.

Putting stories and civil sensibilities together may not change views, Laoudji says, but finding common ground is more likely when people understand why others believe what they do and those with opposing views aren’t demonized.

Laoudji’s life experiences instilled a passion for reconciliation. He was born in Tunisia to a Muslim father and a Polish Roman Catholic mother who fought about religion. His parents divorced when he was six, and he moved to the U.S. with his mother and sister. He founded the Mantle Project a year ago after graduating from the MIT Sloan School of Management. He also works with the MIT Community Innovators Lab and has conducted interviews with dissidents in Tunis, where the Arab Spring began.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

ALS Patients Testing Home-Brewed Drugs

Posted By Prucia Buscell, Thursday, March 28, 2013
Updated: Friday, March 29, 2013

Networking and internet research help patients become increasingly involved in treatment of their illnesses, and people with Lou Gehrig’s disease are providing dramatic examples of medical autonomy. Many are making themselves guinea pigs to test unofficial treatments.

Lou Gehrig’s disease, also known as ALS for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, is a degenerative disease that damages nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord and leads to loss of muscle control and eventual immobility. Life expectancy after diagnosis is only two to five yeas, and there is no known cure.

"Do It Yourself Medicine,” a story in TheScientist.com by Jef Akst tells the story of Eric Valor, a 42-year-old with advanced ALS who helped set up an independent drug trial for himself and other ALS sufferers. Although he needs a ventilator to breathe and cannot move any part of his body except his eyes and some facial muscles, he managed to use his eyes to research the web for information about a new drug and set up a website where he and fellow experimenters could report their data. Clinical trials for a new ALS drug NP001 developed by Neuraltus Pharmaceuticals, were to begin in 2010, but Valor’s debilitated physical condition made him ineligible. Developers hope the drug might slow progression of the disease, so to show any impact Valor couldn’t just stop getting worse. He’d have to start getting better, something not proven with any ALS drug.

Based on their research, Valor and others thought the drug contained 50 percent sodium chlorite, a chemical available online for about $50 a quart. He asked his mother to inject a dilute solution into his feeding tube. More than two dozen patients have done the same, and shared their experiences and data. They used a site at PatientsLikeMe, a company cofounded in 2004 by three MIT engineers, Benjamin and James Heywood and Jeff Cole. The Heywood family had spent years searching for anything that would extend and improve the life of a third brother who had ALS, and the experience inspired creation of a health sharing platform. The goal is to help patients manage their own care, and change the way industry conducts research.

According to a Wall Street Journal story by Amy Docker Marcus, many ALS patients concoct their own drugs because they feel they don’t have time to wait for clinical trials and FDA approval. They are also reluctant to risk getting placebos rather than the real thing in a clinical trail. Some medical authorities worry about that approach. Marcus quotes Jonathan D. Glass, professor of neurology at Emory University School of Medicine, who suggests research needs the rigors and controls set by the medical establishment. He worries that guinea pigs could hurt themselves, adding, "Who knows what they’re actually making in their kitchens?”

Neurologist and researcher Richard Bedlack, who directs the Duke University ALS Clinic, thinks greater patient involvement is a good thing. "There’s a new model of medicine, in my opinion,” he told TheScientist. "Once upon a time we had a very paternalistic system where patients would come…and doctors would ask all the questions and give all the answers. In the past decade, things have really shifted, almost to the other side, where a lot of medicine is autonomous now.”

Results from the independent sodium chlorite trials are equivocal. While some self-dosers reported improvement, a report published by PatientsLikeMe investigators found a potentially negative effect. Neuraltus researchers last October announced its drug showed progress, and it seeks a big-pharma partner for a Phase 3 clinical trial. Valor, for one, would like early access to the drug, and he sees no conflict in being both patient and researcher. "I just treat myself as another lab rat,” he said.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Family Stories Help Kids Be Resilient “Oscillating Narratives” Are Healthiest

Posted By Prucia Buscell, Thursday, March 21, 2013

Do you know where your grandparents grew up? Do you know where your parents went to school and how they met? Do you know the story of your birth?

Marshall Duke, a psychologist at Emory University and his colleague Robyn Fivush, director of Emory’s Family Narratives Lab, developed a measure that asks school children 20 questions about their families. They found that kids who know the most about their families tend to be the most resilient when they face adversity, and the measure tends to be a good predictor of children’s emotional health and happiness.

In his New York Times column "Family Stories That Bind Us,” Bruce Feiler reports on the research and suggests the one most important thing you can do for your family is to develop a strong family narrative. Feiler, who is a scholar of religion and the Middle East, is also the author of the book The Secrets of Happy Families.

Feiler says Duke and Fivush have found kids who know their family history have a strong sense of their "intergenerational selves” and know they belong to something bigger than themselves. It also helps to have family traditions that children remember and carry on.

Psychologists say every family has some unifying narrative, Feiler reports, and they tend to take three shapes. The ascending narrative says: we started with nothing, overcame obstacles and succeeded. The descending narrative says: once we had it all, but we lost everything. The healthiest, according to Duke, is the oscillating narrative: we’ve had our ups and downs, our successes and failures, but we’ve always stuck together, no matter what happened.

Leaders in business and politics also use narratives to explain core meanings, Feiler writes, and he says the military has found that teaching recruits the history of their service is more effective than bullying in promoting camaraderie and unit cohesion. He quotes Commander David G. Smith, chairman of the department of leadership, ethics and law at the Naval Academy, who advises graduating seniors to take freshmen to cemeteries to see the graves of early naval heroes and aircraft displays on campus to help them build a sense of history.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Insect Drones and Pig Replacement Parts

Posted By Prucia Buscell, Thursday, March 14, 2013

Drones have been in the news lately, and the next generation of drones may involve an even more controversial and exotic technology. They may be very tiny cyborgs.

Amit Lal, an engineer, Cornell professor and program manager for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) wrote a proposal for prospective researchers years ago suggesting if scientists could hack into insect bodies and control their movements, they’d have a real start on small scale flying machines. Michael Maharbiz at the University of California, Berkeley, took up the challenge. He and his team began researching the biology of the Mecynorrhina torquata, at 2-3 inches long, the world’s second largest flower beetle. Its hard shell and size make it capable of carrying a significant amount of cargo, including a "backpack” of electronic gear attached to its back with beeswax. Researchers wired the creature’s brain so it could be steered remotely, and loaded the backpack with a tiny battery, miniature radio receiver and a custom built circuit board.


Emily Anthes describes the race to create insect cyborgs in an article in The Guardian. She is also author of a new book, Frankenstein's Cat: Cuddling Up to Biotech's Brave New Beasts, which contains the story of DARPA’s quest. Anthes quotes Maharbiz as saying the beetlebots, which still haven’t been deployed in the field, will be able to provide intelligence in military operations and save lives in earthquakes by directing rescue teams to humans trapped in ruble. Critics have worried that cyborg beetles could be used to launch germ warfare or spy on civilians, but Maharbiz scoffs at such sinister suggestions. He is now working on a remote controlled cyborg fly, an even more difficult project because of its smaller size and weight. Such cyborg insects could fly into buildings and caves, alerting soldiers and distant observers to the presence of explosives and information to gauge whether human occupants were enemies or civilians.

Bioengineering has advanced dramatically since Dolly the Sheep was cloned in 1996. Listen to Anthes’s interview with Terri Gross on NPR's Fresh Air. Some wealthy people clone their pets-it’s six figures for a dog-and people can buy genetically modified bright colored fish that glow in the dark. But there are more serious endeavors. It’s no longer rare for a human to receive a valve from a pig heart. Scientists are now trying to grow pigs that will produce numerous whole organs for human transplants and goats injected with human genes that can produce protein rich milk with the antibiotic properties of human breast milk. Anthes describes how Chinese scientists are identifying the functions of each gene in the mouse genome by disabling one gene at a time and monitoring how the mutant mice develop. She told Gross that among the lab’s 45,000 mouse cages there are mice with cancer, male pattern baldness, obsessive compulsive disorder, and some that are only able to turn left. The discoveries could eventually help understand genes involved in human diseases and afflictions.

And the ethics of all this? Anthes concedes it’s complex. People might accept an experiment intended to treat cancer more readily than one to prevent baldness, says Anthes. Is it all right to risk harm to animals in the name of research? Unintended consequences can’t be ruled out in experimental work, Anthes says, so researchers have to worry. Scientists successfully engineered leaner, faster growing pigs, she notes, but the pigs were miserable with arthritis, eye problems and other health woes. In a New York Times essay, Anthes describes genetically modified salmon that grow faster because they’ve been engineered to carry the genes of another species, the ocean pout. It soon may be the first transgenic animal in the human food supply. While Anthes agrees with the need for painstaking evaluation, she hopes fear of genetic modification won’t prevent innovative scientific research with potential to help human health.

photo: male and female Mecynorrhina tortuata beetles

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Learning to Tend Our Microbial Gardens

Posted By Prucia Buscell, Thursday, March 07, 2013

Ecologist Jessica Green thinks of indoor air as a microbial garden, and she thinks architects and biologists can collaborate to make our indoor environments much healthier for humans.

In a TEDx talk, Green describes what we are doing to indoor air now. She calls it "microbial genocide.” We seal the buildings and use air conditioning and filtration systems to make sure outdoor microbes don’t get in. People come in bringing millions of microbes shedding from their bodies and they stir up the microbial dust languishing every surface. We keep the temperature and humidity in the same narrow range. And then, she says, we regularly kill every organism we can with antimicrobial cleaning products. "If you had a garden,” she says, "you’d never kill everything in it to get rid of one weed.”

Microbes—bacteria, viruses and archaea—are the most abundant organisms on earth, and while some make us sick, our bodies need many of them to protect us from pathogens, and boost our immune systems. They even influence our moods. "When you clean the organisms from an ecosystem,” she explains, "you make space for the weedy and fast growing organisms to come in and colonize those spaces.”

Green is an associate professor at the University of Oregon, and a co-founder of the university’s Biology and Built Environment Center. She began her career researching microbes in the Arctic and other exotic places. She also had background in civil and environmental engineering and she realized examining the built environment where we spend 90 percent of our time would make her research relevant to issues surrounding sustainability, design and human health. A Discover Magazine story by Bruce Barcott reports that G.Z. "Charlie” Brown, a colleague at the University of Oregon and an expert in sustainable buildings, wanted research data to influence a new generation of hospitals on how energy-saving ventilation systems could also produce healthier hospital air. Green persuaded the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation to put up the money and the BioBE Center was born.

The Discover story describes Green as an adventurous scientist and a fearless athlete. She was known as Thumper Biscuit in her Roller Derby competition days. A Forbes magazine story by Bruce Upbin explains she and her colleagues have worked with architectural modeling software, genetic sequencing, and microbial ecology to map the microbiomes of the built environment. "We’ve learned that architects are impacting what microbes live where,” she told Forbes. "It’s a new dimension of their work.” Surfaces of desks, for example, foster microbial colonies that differ from the colonies living on walls near air conditioning vents.

In research relevant to hospitals, Green and colleagues compared microbial environments in rooms with open windows and sealed rooms with mechanical ventilation systems. In a TED talk, she says green buildings, designed to let outside air in, fostered a diverse microbial mix that included organisms one finds outdoors in plants and soil, and a higher likelihood of organisms that promote health. In rooms with mechanically ventilated air, the microbial populations were less diverse, and more akin to the populations associated with humans, and had a higher probability of carrying pathogens.

In microbial populations, as in agriculture, monocultures tend to be unhealthy. People eat probiotic yogurt for health, and the same principle may apply to interior spaces. The Forbes story says Ford has contacted Green about design to foster health-promotion organisms inside its cars and trucks. "There are organisms that make our skin more supple and smooth,” Green told Forbes. "I can totally see it: the probiotic steering wheel.”

Humans have been around for hundreds of thousands of years, but only in the last 60 years or so have we spent most of our time in hermetically sealed indoor environments, Green observes. She among the scientists pioneering the research to learn what that means. One possibility she speculates, is that "We are growing a microbial monoculture, and our bodies probably have not evolved to function well in this microbial environment.” Some evidence suggests indoor living may be associated with antibiotic resistance and auto immune disorders such as asthma and allergies. Research by Green and others may lead to new floor plans, new ventilation systems, and new ways to grow robust, diverse and healthy microbial gardens inside our buildings. Green coauthored the paper Architectural Design Influences the Diversity and Structure of the Built Environment Microbiome.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 
Page 1 of 21
1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  >   >>   >|